| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 3 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 3 Guest(s)
|
| Latest Threads |
Form submission: Private ...
Forum: Parking Charge Notices forum
Last Post: tester3
01-07-2026, 08:13 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 19
|
ECP Thu 01/01/2026
Forum: Parking Charge Notices forum
Last Post: tester3
01-07-2026, 08:01 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 79
|
test55
Forum: Parking Charge Notices forum
Last Post: tester3
01-07-2026, 07:34 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 22
|
test44
Forum: Parking Charge Notices forum
Last Post: tester2
01-07-2026, 07:33 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 17
|
How to get advice on your...
Forum: Forum advice & announcements
Last Post: danny
01-07-2026, 02:08 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 48
|
Start Here: Private Parki...
Forum: Forum advice & announcements
Last Post: danny
01-06-2026, 12:13 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 60
|
Who is behind this forum ...
Forum: Forum advice & announcements
Last Post: danny
01-06-2026, 12:10 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 66
|
CCJs, credit records, and...
Forum: Forum advice & announcements
Last Post: danny
01-06-2026, 12:07 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 62
|
|
|
How to get advice on your Parking Charge Notice (PCN) |
|
Posted by: danny - 01-07-2026, 02:08 PM - Forum: Forum advice & announcements
- No Replies
|
 |
How to get advice on your Parking Charge Notice (PCN)
If you have received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) from a private parking company and would like advice, please start by creating a new thread using the PCN information form:
https://pptla.uk/form.php?formid=2
The form exists for one simple reason:
good advice depends on accurate information.
Private parking cases often turn on small but important details. The wording of the notice, the dates, the location, and the type of land involved can all change the correct course of action. Without the basics, any advice would be guesswork.
What we need from you
When creating your thread, please complete the form as fully and accurately as possible. The form will prompt you for the key details of your PCN and will create a thread containing that information so it can be reviewed properly.
If you are unsure about a particular field, answer as best you can. If something genuinely does not apply, say so.
Do not worry about “getting it wrong”. The purpose is to provide enough context for informed advice to be given.
What happens next
Once your thread is created:
- your PCN details will be in one place
- advisers can see the full picture immediately
- further questions and discussion can happen in the same thread
This avoids repeated questions, missing information, and conflicting advice.
Important points
- This forum deals only with private parking charges, not council or Transport for London penalties
- Debt collector letters do not require urgent action
- Do not rush to pay simply because a demand looks official
If you are unsure where to start, read the pinned information threads first. They explain how private parking works and why many charges can be challenged successfully.
In short
Use the form → create your thread → receive informed advice.
The aim is to replace fear and confusion with clarity and a sensible plan of action.
|
|
|
|
Start Here: Private Parking Ticket Legal Advice (PPTLA) |
|
Posted by: danny - 01-06-2026, 12:13 AM - Forum: Forum advice & announcements
- No Replies
|
|
Start Here: Private Parking Ticket Legal Advice (PPTLA)
If you have received a parking charge notice from a private parking company, you have probably been made to feel that you must pay quickly or face serious consequences.
That reaction is not accidental.
Private parking firms issue demands that are deliberately designed to look official, urgent, and intimidating. Most people who receive them pay without understanding what they are paying or why.
In industry terms, those people are treated as low-hanging fruit — easy targets who can be pressured into paying through fear and confusion rather than legal merit.
This forum exists to stop that happening.
An unregulated industry
Private parking in the UK is an unregulated industry.
These companies are not councils, police forces, or statutory enforcement bodies. They operate as private, profit-driven businesses attempting to enforce parking terms through contractual claims, not fines or penalties.
To obtain vehicle keeper data from the DVLA, private parking firms must belong to one of two Accredited Trade Associations (ATAs):
- the British Parking Association (BPA)
- the International Parking Community (IPC)
These bodies are not regulators. They are private membership organisations funded by the parking companies themselves. Their purpose is to serve their members’ interests, not to protect motorists.
Membership of an ATA does not mean a parking company is regulated, fair, or independent.
Why most people pay
Private parking companies issue over 40,000 parking charge notices every day. The vast majority are paid at a so-called “discounted” rate.
This is not because the charges are sound or enforceable. It is because:
- the language is misleading
- the threat of consequences is exaggerated
- the legal process is poorly understood
The system relies on motorists acting quickly and without knowledge.
Where Gullible Tree fits in
The term “low-hanging fruit” is not accidental.
It comes from Gullible Tree, a not-for-profit information project created to expose how the private parking industry exploits fear, ignorance, and inaction.
Gullible Tree explains why this system works, how motorists are manipulated into compliance, and how private parking firms profit from misunderstanding.
PPTLA is the practical extension of that work: a place where people can apply that understanding to real situations and learn what to do next.
What PPTLA is here to do
This forum provides clear, outcome-focused information about:
- what a private parking charge actually is
- why it is not a fine
- how parking companies use pressure tactics
- when and how charges can be challenged
- how claims are dealt with in practice
People who follow the structured advice provided here routinely avoid paying these charges at all. Many cases never reach court. Many others are discontinued or struck out once properly defended.
What this forum is — and is not
This forum provides information and guidance.
It does not provide legal representation.
It does not guarantee outcomes.
Its purpose is simple: to ensure that motorists are no longer easy targets — no longer low-hanging fruit.
Read the information threads first. Understand the system. Then act from knowledge rather than fear.
|
|
|
|
|
Who is behind this forum and where the advice comes from |
|
Posted by: danny - 01-06-2026, 12:10 AM - Forum: Forum advice & announcements
- No Replies
|
|
Who is behind this forum and where the advice comes from
PPTLA is closely linked with the information project Gullible Tree — both share the same purpose: to help motorists avoid being misled, frightened, or financially harmed by unregulated private parking companies.
About me
My name is Danny Fyne.
I’m a retired airline pilot who never expected to become immersed in the world of private parking enforcement. That changed when I helped a close friend contest a Parking Charge Notice issued by an unregulated private parking company. What I uncovered was an industry operating in a legal grey zone — unregulated, hugely profitable, and issuing tens of thousands of so-called “parking fines” every day to ordinary motorists. Most people receiving these demands have no idea these charges are not statutory fines but speculative invoices designed to extract money through fear, confusion, or ignorance. (gullibletree.com)
What began as one case turned into dozens, then hundreds. For several years I’ve been helping people:
- understand their legal rights
- draft effective appeals
- defend themselves against aggressive debt recovery tactics
- respond to county court claims
I now operate this forum and the Gullible Tree project to share the knowledge I’ve acquired because I’ve seen first-hand how this industry exploits legal ignorance to extract money from otherwise innocent people.
Experience and focus
I’ve spent many hundreds of hours studying:
- relevant legislation
- case law
- industry codes of practice
- civil procedure rules
- real claims and defences
That experience means I understand the tactics and weaknesses of private parking companies better than most general advisers. Many mainstream advice services simply do not have the specialist insight required to deal with these cases effectively. (gullibletree.com)
What this advice covers — and what it doesn’t
To be clear:
- This forum and the linked advice focus only on parking charges issued by private parking companies (such as ParkingEye, UKPC, Horizon, MET, NCP, and others). (gullibletree.com)
- This is not legal representation and we are not solicitors.
- For council or Transport for London statutory Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs), which operate under a different legal regime, see the volunteer-run site Free Traffic Legal Advice (ftla.uk). (gullibletree.com)
The purpose here is to help people avoid becoming low-hanging fruit for private parking firms — firms that depend on motorists not understanding the difference between a statutory fine and an unregulated, speculative invoice.
No fees, no business model
I do not charge for this help, and this is not a business. Voluntary donations are accepted, particularly where advice has successfully helped someone defeat a Parking Charge Notice, but the work exists because the system is unfair — not because it is profitable.
I do this because I believe in fairness, and because I know how overwhelming it can feel when you are suddenly faced with threatening letters or a county court claim.
If you are dealing with a private parking charge and you’re not sure where to start, this forum is designed to guide you through what actually matters.
|
|
|
|
|
CCJs, credit records, and bailiffs — separating ignorance & fear from reality |
|
Posted by: danny - 01-06-2026, 12:07 AM - Forum: Forum advice & announcements
- No Replies
|
|
CCJs, credit records, and bailiffs — separating fear from reality
One of the main reasons people pay private parking charges is fear of a County Court Judgment (CCJ) or bailiffs turning up at their door.
That fear is almost always misplaced.
Private parking companies and their debt collectors rely heavily on public misunderstanding of how the court system actually works. This thread explains the reality, plainly and without drama.
Following the advice here does not put you at risk of a CCJ
People often worry that by challenging a private parking charge or defending a claim they are “risking a CCJ”.
That is not how the system works.
Even in the very rare situation where:
- a parking company issues a county court claim, and
- the claim goes all the way to a hearing, and
- the motorist loses
there is still no danger to your credit record, provided the court-ordered amount is paid within one calendar month.
If payment is made within that time:
- no CCJ is registered
- nothing appears on any credit file
- there is no lasting record
In practical terms, it is as if the judgment never existed.
This is why challenging unfair charges is not “risky”. The real risk lies in paying without understanding.
A CCJ does not happen “out of the blue”
A CCJ can only exist if all of the following happen:
- a court claim is issued
- judgment is entered (either by default or after a hearing)
- the judgment remains unpaid for more than 30 days
Anything short of that means no CCJ.
Debt recovery letters, threats of court, or even the issue of a claim form do not affect your credit record.
Why bailiffs are mentioned at all
Bailiffs are only mentioned here because many low-hanging fruit wrongly believe that:
- a debt recovery letter allows bailiffs to attend
- unpaid parking charges automatically lead to enforcement
- credit damage happens before court
None of that is true.
Bailiffs can only ever be instructed if:
- a CCJ exists, and
- that CCJ has been ignored, and
- enforcement is specifically applied for
Without an unpaid CCJ, bailiffs have no lawful role whatsoever.
Why bailiffs are almost never relevant in parking cases
Even where a CCJ exists and is unpaid, bailiffs are still uncommon in private parking cases.
For typical parking amounts:
- anything under roughly £600 is usually not worth pursuing through County Court bailiffs
- the cost and effort outweighs the return
This is why the bailiff threat exists mainly as psychological pressure, not as a realistic outcome.
The “Don’t Pay, We’ll Take It Away” effect
Many people’s fear of bailiffs comes from television programmes such as Don’t Pay, We’ll Take It Away, which follow High Court Enforcement Officers dealing with large, serious debts under High Court warrants.
That has nothing to do with private parking charges.
Some debt recovery firms exploit this fear deliberately. One of the most obvious examples is DCBL, whose High Court enforcement arm featured heavily in that programme.
DCBL now uses similar branding and wording in ordinary debt recovery letters, even though those letters:
- carry no enforcement power
- do not involve the High Court
- do not permit bailiff action
This branding is designed to frighten low-hanging fruit into paying out of ignorance.
The reality
When people follow the advice on this forum:
- many charges are cancelled early
- many claims are discontinued
- some are struck out
- a very small number reach a hearing
Even in that last category, there is still no credit risk if the judgment is dealt with properly.
Understanding this removes the fear that keeps the private parking industry profitable.
Bottom line
Challenging a private parking charge does not endanger your credit record.
Defending a claim does not create a CCJ.
Bailiffs are irrelevant unless a court judgment is ignored.
The people who pay are almost always those who act from fear rather than knowledge — the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree.
This forum exists to make sure you are not one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
