![]() |
|
DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - Printable Version +- Private Parking Ticket Legal Advice (PPTLA) (https://pptla.uk) +-- Forum: Legal advice forum (https://pptla.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Parking Charge Notices forum (https://pptla.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected (/showthread.php?tid=45) Pages:
1
2
|
DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - Eryobotrya - 02-16-2026 Hello again b789. You might remember me from ftla. Thought you should see this to forestall the same thing happening to other enquirers: https://ibb.co/27wKL96Y The gamble didn't pay off this time, but it was worth a punt - just about. RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - b789 - 02-19-2026 Hi @Eryobotrya. Thanks for sharing the order. I no longer have access to FTLA, so I do not know the background. What exactly was the application you made — was it a costs application following discontinuance, or something else? From the face of the order, the judge has struck out your application and made clear that, even if the signatory of the form was not authorised to conduct litigation, that point alone did not amount to unreasonable conduct under CPR 27.14(2)(g) in the small claims track. That does not mean the authorisation issue is irrelevant. It means that in a small claims context, the threshold for “unreasonable conduct” is high. Discontinuance, even combined with a potential authorisation defect, will not automatically justify costs. The fact that a form may have been signed or filed by someone without litigation rights does not automatically render the entire claim void. In principle, the defect can be addressed procedurally. However, as this order demonstrates, in the small claims track the court may take the view that such a defect, even if established, is not enough on its own to amount to unreasonable conduct for the purposes of CPR 27.14(2)(g). On the information available from the order alone, the judge has simply taken the view that this was not enough to justify a departure from the usual small claims costs position. If you can outline the procedural steps that led to this application, it will be easier to assess whether the “punt” was realistically winnable or always going to be an uphill argument in small claims. RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - Eryobotrya - 02-19-2026 The 'punt' was pursued on the basis of your advice on ftla. I'll copy it across from ftla later to remind you of the background. I only came here to let you know that the N244 application was rejected so that others are spared the cost of £120 for an action that is unlikely to succeed. RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - Eryobotrya - 02-20-2026 Here's some background to jog your memory: Quote:Thank you for that. You should now send the following email to info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC yourself: Quote: RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - b789 - 02-20-2026 Did I suggest you pay for an N244 application? RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - Eryobotrya - 02-23-2026 (02-20-2026, 01:16 AM)b789 Wrote: Did I suggest you pay for an N244 application? Unfortunately, the judge insisted on one, so it was either a case of coughing up or dropping the application. I then put the question to the experts on ftla whether it was worth pursuing, and they put the ball in my court by asking about my appetite for risk. I cogitated over the wk/end, then decided it was worth the punt, based largely on your advice. But no, you didn't advise me to pay their fee. I think you left ftla by then, so I made that call on my todd. To be clear, not blaming you for the loss. The final decision was mine, and these fightback forums have saved me a lot more than a mere £120, so it's neither here nor there. Just saying that in light of that adverse decision, you might want to adjust the advice you give to others about these applications. Apart from which, it also gives DCBL an excuse to laugh up their sleeve coz they got away with it this time. RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - b789 - 02-24-2026 Ah, OK. I certainly wouldn’t have advised forking out for an N244 application. It’s always worth trying to write to the judge. Some are OK and others are “by the book”. It’s called Judge Bingo. Never mind. You hopefully had a life lesson and are much better equipped going forwards. RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - Eryobotrya - 03-27-2026 (02-24-2026, 05:14 AM)b789 Wrote: Ah, OK. I certainly wouldn’t have advised forking out for an N244 application. It’s always worth trying to write to the judge. Some are OK and others are “by the book”. It’s called Judge Bingo. Ha!! If only. Do you still have access to ftla? If so, I would appreciate your input re. a thread I just posted there. If I gave you the link, would you be able to comment here, perhaps in a another thread if necessary? RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - b789 - 03-27-2026 I can have a look but to make it a bit easier if you could fill in the PCN details form here and paste the summary in a new thread. https://gullibletree.com/tools/pcnform_main.html Trying to deal with two different cases in the same thread is very difficult. RE: DCBL - N244 Application Rejected - Eryobotrya - 03-27-2026 Well, I tried, but you must have a glitch in there somewhere. It wouldn't allow me to enter the first of the key dates. How about I just posted the link to the uploaded images in a new thread, with the background? |