Yesterday, 05:58 PM
This is a singe point of law issue. The driver is not identified. The ONLY way a Keeper can be held liable is if the creditor has fully complied with all the requirements of PiFA. They have not. They have admitted so.
So, without PoFA, there is NO Keeper liability. If the IAS supposedly legally trained adjudicator is not just a corrupt pretender, they will agree. If they don’t, it is just more evidence of the corrupt nature of the IAS.
No court would be able to ignore this point. The IAS is not a court. It is a privately owned company, owned by the same firm that is the IPC.
Use that point in your response. Nothing else matters. There is no assumption in civil law that the Keeper is slo the driver. End of.
So, without PoFA, there is NO Keeper liability. If the IAS supposedly legally trained adjudicator is not just a corrupt pretender, they will agree. If they don’t, it is just more evidence of the corrupt nature of the IAS.
No court would be able to ignore this point. The IAS is not a court. It is a privately owned company, owned by the same firm that is the IPC.
Use that point in your response. Nothing else matters. There is no assumption in civil law that the Keeper is slo the driver. End of.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. - Mark Twain
