04-11-2026, 02:38 PM
(04-11-2026, 11:56 AM)b789 Wrote: As expected, the NtK does not comply with PoFA paragraph 9(2)(e)(i), because it does not contain the required invitation to the Keeper to pay the charge. ParkingEye has already lost a county court claim on this exact point.
For now, continue trying to get Lidl to have the PCN cancelled. If that does not succeed before the appeal deadline, submit the appeal I have suggested and we will take it from there.
Very interesting that they don't comply with the regulations. Considering they have already lost a claim on that point. One would think they would have fixed that mistake by now!
Thank you I will take your advice. Will come back here when I have more info.

