06-12-2026, 06:37 PM
@Barbudaprince, you do not need to read the entire Liberty Homes transcript. It is a lengthy High Court judgment and only a very small part of it is relevant to your case.
The reason it is referenced is because it deals with what a claimant must include in its Particulars of Claim. In simple terms, if someone brings a contractual claim, they must properly explain the contractual basis of that claim so the defendant knows what case they have to answer.
For your purposes, the relevant paragraphs are 35-37 and paragraph 144.
Paragraphs 35-37 explain that a claimant must plead the material facts necessary to establish its contractual case. A defendant should not be left guessing which contractual terms are relied upon or what is alleged to have been breached.
Paragraph 144 is particularly useful because it confirms that defects in pleadings cannot simply be fixed later through witness statements or evidence. The claimant is expected to properly plead its case from the outset.
The relevance to your case is that UKCPM's original PoC were extremely sparse and failed to explain the contractual basis of the claim with any real clarity. The fact that the court has now required detailed Particulars rather demonstrates the point.
So don't get bogged down reading dozens of pages. Just understand the principle: a claimant must properly explain its case in its Particulars of Claim, and that is why Liberty Homes is being relied upon. The only parts you really need to be familiar with are paragraphs 35-37 and 144.
The reason it is referenced is because it deals with what a claimant must include in its Particulars of Claim. In simple terms, if someone brings a contractual claim, they must properly explain the contractual basis of that claim so the defendant knows what case they have to answer.
For your purposes, the relevant paragraphs are 35-37 and paragraph 144.
Paragraphs 35-37 explain that a claimant must plead the material facts necessary to establish its contractual case. A defendant should not be left guessing which contractual terms are relied upon or what is alleged to have been breached.
Paragraph 144 is particularly useful because it confirms that defects in pleadings cannot simply be fixed later through witness statements or evidence. The claimant is expected to properly plead its case from the outset.
The relevance to your case is that UKCPM's original PoC were extremely sparse and failed to explain the contractual basis of the claim with any real clarity. The fact that the court has now required detailed Particulars rather demonstrates the point.
So don't get bogged down reading dozens of pages. Just understand the principle: a claimant must properly explain its case in its Particulars of Claim, and that is why Liberty Homes is being relied upon. The only parts you really need to be familiar with are paragraphs 35-37 and 144.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. - Mark Twain
