01-19-2026, 04:52 PM
Just to clarify, this is also a "double dip" where the first exit and second entry ANPR images are "orphaned" and two separate visits have been merged to show a single visit from the first entry to the second exit?
Just putting to gather further ammunition as a double dip is also a breach of the PPSCoP section 7.3(d) where the operator has failed to perform the required manual quality control check on the ANPR images. Note 1 clearly states:
Just putting to gather further ammunition as a double dip is also a breach of the PPSCoP section 7.3(d) where the operator has failed to perform the required manual quality control check on the ANPR images. Note 1 clearly states:
Quote:7.3. Use of photographic evidence
Photographic evidence must not be used by a parking operator as the basis for issuing a parking charge unless:
d) images generated by ANPR or CCTV have been subject to a manual quality control check, including the accuracy of the timestamp and the risk of keying errors.
NOTE 1: The manual quality control check for remote ANPR and CCTV systems is particularly important for detecting issues such as “double dipping”, where image camera systems might have failed to accurately record each instance when a vehicle enters and leaves controlled land, and for checking images that might have been taken other than by a trained parking attendant (see Clause 15). The manual check might also reveal where “tailgating” – vehicles passing a camera close together – is a problem, suggesting relocation of the camera might be necessary.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. - Mark Twain

