09-18-2026, 03:37 PM
@b789
Gladstones have now replied again after my final short response. Their full reply is below:
---
Dear [my name],
Further to your email dated 18th August 2026.
Please see attached signage along with the site map as requested.
As the content of the Landowner Agreement is commercially sensitive, a (redacted) copy of the same will only be released at the direction of the Court. This is usually, but not limited to, 14 days prior to the hearing.
The amount due includes £70.00 claimed by our client for the time/resources spent facilitating the recovery of the unpaid parking charge notice(s) pursuant to its ATA’s Code of Practice and the Terms and Conditions of the Contract, which was entered into upon the driver of the vehicle entering the Relevant Land.
We remind you it is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they comply with the parking regulations on site and thus, as it is abundantly clear you have failed to do so, we are satisfied the charges have been issued correctly and all sums owing are due in full.
As a gesture of goodwill, we have extended the date within which to make payment to the 21st September 2026. In the event you do not make payment, we carry instructions to issue legal proceedings to recover the debt in full. Should it become necessary to issue legal proceedings, we strongly recommend you follow the steps on the claim form upon receipt of the same.
For the avoidance of doubt, we confirm we will not accept any further submissions from you.
---
They attached a PDF headed “Site Map”, which i've attached. They still have not provided the full unedited video footage. They have also refused to provide the landowner agreement at this stage, saying it is commercially sensitive and will only be released at the direction of the court.
Their explanation for the added £70 also appears to be the usual time/resources/debt recovery wording.
Given they say they will not accept further submissions, should I now leave it and wait for the claim, or is there any tactical value in sending one final reply?
Gladstones have now replied again after my final short response. Their full reply is below:
---
Dear [my name],
Further to your email dated 18th August 2026.
Please see attached signage along with the site map as requested.
As the content of the Landowner Agreement is commercially sensitive, a (redacted) copy of the same will only be released at the direction of the Court. This is usually, but not limited to, 14 days prior to the hearing.
The amount due includes £70.00 claimed by our client for the time/resources spent facilitating the recovery of the unpaid parking charge notice(s) pursuant to its ATA’s Code of Practice and the Terms and Conditions of the Contract, which was entered into upon the driver of the vehicle entering the Relevant Land.
We remind you it is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they comply with the parking regulations on site and thus, as it is abundantly clear you have failed to do so, we are satisfied the charges have been issued correctly and all sums owing are due in full.
As a gesture of goodwill, we have extended the date within which to make payment to the 21st September 2026. In the event you do not make payment, we carry instructions to issue legal proceedings to recover the debt in full. Should it become necessary to issue legal proceedings, we strongly recommend you follow the steps on the claim form upon receipt of the same.
For the avoidance of doubt, we confirm we will not accept any further submissions from you.
---
They attached a PDF headed “Site Map”, which i've attached. They still have not provided the full unedited video footage. They have also refused to provide the landowner agreement at this stage, saying it is commercially sensitive and will only be released at the direction of the court.
Their explanation for the added £70 also appears to be the usual time/resources/debt recovery wording.
Given they say they will not accept further submissions, should I now leave it and wait for the claim, or is there any tactical value in sending one final reply?
